thepoll
Do your clients spend more in the UK than other destinations?
Yes, the exchange rate is better
Yes, South African travellers like spending more in Britain/ there is more to spend on in Britain
No, South African travellers to Britain spend, on average, the same amount as other destinations
No, I don’t know – I haven’t noticed

 
DAYS
HRS
MIN
SEC
WTM Africa countdown_March - April 2017
Submit
NewsArticle
Satsa mulls legal action against UBC requirement Today's News


Print   Send to a friend

A stalemate between the Department of Home Affairs and the tourism sector could end in a legal suit.

This comes after industry’s lobbying to scrap the requirement that children travelling to South Africa produce an unabridged birth certificate have come to naught.

David Frost, Satsa ceo, said that legal action against the Department of Home Affairs was a possibility and the association had already sought legal counsel.

“Legal action is an option and it is certainly the last resort and not something that anybody wants to do but it is an option when you’ve exhausted every other avenue,” said David. “And it looks very much like we’ve exhausted every other avenue.”

David said that what was needed was for the Minister of Home Affairs, Malusi Gigaba to provide the basis of the policy implementation. “Ultimately what you want is a court of law to be able to put the Minister of Home Affairs on the stand and ask him to provide the rational basis for the UBC requirement: how many children have been trafficked? How big is the problem?” 

David added that they had sought an opinion from senior legal counsel that he would table at the Tourism Business Council of South Africa as an option to consider. “If anyone can provide an alternative remedy to sort the problem out, I’m open to listening to it,” said David. “It’s been two years and we’ve made no progress, nor has the Minister of Tourism, nor has the Deputy President, nor the Inter-Ministerial Committee.”

James Vos, Shadow Minster of Tourism, told Tourism Update that the DA would release a statement outlining their comments on the Draft First Amendment of the Immigration Regulations, 2014 before the end of this week. James said what was needed was to remove the ambiguity from the regulations and gave the example of the word “may” where the amendment states: “Where a parent or parents, from a visa-exempt country, who is or are travelling with a child, such parent or parents may be required by an immigration officer to produce the child’s unabridged birth certificate upon admission into or departure from the Republic…” According to James the application process should be streamlined and made easy to understand. 

He added that they would make recommendations on what needed to be amended, excluded and also provide solutions to these. 

James also said that electronic visas would be an option to consider, where biometrics are captured on arrival but that all immigration desks needed to be operating during peak periods. He emphasised how delays in airport queues cut into the traveller’s itinerary and prevented them from spending money in South Africa.

Kim Emmanuel


Today's News



comments powered by Disqus
Today'sNews
 latest  previous
Tell us one thing you’d change at work and win R5 000
If you could change one thing in your travel...
SAA adds capacity on Johannesburg-Vic Falls route
SAA has increased capacity between Johannesburg...
Emirates has back-up plan for electronics ban
Emirates is the only airline to have come up with...
How safe is OR Tambo?
Earlier this month, a robbery took place at OR...
Correction: Amadeus launches new rail offering for agents
In an eTNW story published on March 24, it was...
Monday smile: First flight to view Southern lights
On March 23, passengers on board an Air New...
Update: London attractions still open to travellers
The London Eye has reopened following the...